Legal Opinion
Litmer v. PDQUSA. Com
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided July 27, 2004No. 1:04-cv-00105PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
COSBEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Paul L. Litmer’s (“Litmer”) complaint alleges that the manufacture and sale of a product called “Mirror Mitts” by Defendant PDQUSA.com (“PDQ”) infringes on a patent held by Litmer, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271. 1 Before the Court is PDQ’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. After considering the motion and the relevant law, the Court finds that the motion should be DENIED.
II. FACTS
Litmer owns United States Patent No. 6,286,964, for a product named “Mirror Cover.” (ComplJ 8.) He…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- LinkAmerica Corp. v. AlbertIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Elayyan Ex Rel. Elayyan v. Sol Melia, SADistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- AdvanceMe, Inc. v. RAPIDPAY LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- Nerds on Call, Inc.(Indiana) v. Nerds on Call, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2008
- Pozzo Truck Center, Inc. v. Crown Beds, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.