Legal Opinion
McGill Technology Ltd. v. Gourmet Technologies, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided January 27, 2004No. 03-40087PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GADOLA, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action involving a frozen confection dispensing ap paratus, i.e., a soft serve ice cream dispenser. See 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendant Gourmet Technologies (“GT”) and Defendant Allied Brands International (“ABI”) have filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff filed a response, and Defendants GT and ABI filed a reply brief. The Court elects to proceed without a hearing. See E.D. Mich. LR…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mink v. AAAA Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Audi AG and Volkswagon of America, Inc. v. D'AmatoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Buccellati Holding Italia Spa v. Laura Buccellati, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In Re Blue Flame Energy Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lifestyle Lift Holding, Co., Inc. v. PrendivilleDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.