Legal Opinion

Wortman v. R. L. Coolsaet Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1943No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 42,039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of no cause of action. The cause was tried without a jury. On the day in question, plaintiff was in the employ of the city of Detroit as a foreman in charge of a group of men who were demolishing buildings on Michigan avenue in conjunction with the street widening of Michigan avenue.

The defendant company was in charge of excavat ing ditches and the laying of gas mains. In performing this work, defendant company used an apparatus set on a caterpillar tractor. A crane extended from the apparatus and to this was attached a clam bucket. The bucket was controlled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arrand v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Reinforced Concrete Pipe Co. v. BoyesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Yearnd v. Northern Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. KaramolMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. EarlMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Mich. Gun Owners, Inc. v. Ann Arbor Pub. Sch.Michigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Gerweck v. Monroe County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API