Legal Opinion

Turgeon v. Naparstek

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 19, 1999No. 966357PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeel, J.

In companion cases arising out of an automobile accident in Quebec, plaintiffs Christine Turgeon and Kok Jung Chen allege that the driver of the other vehicle, a Massachusetts resident, was negligent. Defendants move for summary judgment on the grounds that Quebec law, which bars automobile accident negligence claims, governs this action and, alternatively, that this action should be dismissed pursuant to the doctrine offorum non conveniens. For the following reasons, the motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

On December 30, 1995, a two car head-on collision occurred in St. Pierre de Veronne, Quebec,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Cosme v. Whitin MacHine Works, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Minnis v. PeeblesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Thomas v. HanmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Turgeon v. Naparstek ex rel. Estate of NaparstekMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API