State v. Laper
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Edmunds County. Hon. J. Ii. BoITum, Judge. George R. Eaper was convicted of receiving stolen property, knowing it to have been stolen, and he appeals from the judgment of conviction, and an order denying a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.
The defendant, upon an information filed by the state’s attorney of Edmunds county, was tried and convicted of a crime of receiving stolen property, knowing it to have been stolen. From the judgment of conviction and order denying a new trial, the defendant has appealed to this court. It is stated, in substance, in the information, that the property alleged to have been received by the defendant knowing it to have been stolen was one sorrel mare with white hind legs and one white fore foot and bald face, stolen by one Henry T. Laper -on the 17th day of January, '1906, and that the said…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boggess v. ReadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- In re McClellan's EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LufkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. GerdesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GehmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Webster v. EkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.