Legal Opinion

Miller v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

At issue in each of the two cases now before the Court is whether chiropractic expenses are “medical services” for purposes of the $750 threshold of the Pennsylvania No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, Act of July 19, 1974, P.L. 489, § 301(a)(5)(B), 40 P.S. § 1009.301(a)(5)(B) (Supp.1980). We conclude that “medical services” include chiropractic services and hence reverse the orders of the Superior Court.

Appellant Margaret Miller and appellant Doris Strunack each filed a complaint in trespass alleging negligence on the part of the named defendants for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Overmyer Mold Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Strunack v. EckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Babcock v. TIPPETTSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Flender Corp. v. Tippins International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Miskofsky v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Dragun v. VolkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. GreggMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API