Legal Opinion

State v. Freih

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 22, 2015No. C112594CR; A153893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant failed to appear for a court date in connection with misdemeanor charges against him and, as a result, was charged and convicted of one count of failure to appear in the second degree, in violation of ORS 162.195(l)(a).1 On appeal, he assigns error to the trial court’s pretrial ruling that he was not entitled to raise a choice-of-evils defense under ORS 161.200, and would not be entitled to a jury instruction on the choice-of-evils defense; defendant sought to defend against the charge on the ground that, in the light of his mother’s medical condition, he had no choice but to miss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. BoldtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DewhittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API