Legal Opinion

Yang v. Washington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 1, 2002No. A02A0274PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

Chang Yang sued Dr. Carl Washington and the Emory Clinic, alleging medical malpractice after a laser procedure performed on her face left permanent scarring. Following a trial, a jury found in favor of the defendants. Yang filed a motion for new trial and a motion for attorney fees, both of which the trial court denied. On appeal, Yang challenges the trial court’s denial of both motions. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. Prior to reaching the merits of the appeal, we find it necessary to address the litigants’ failure to follow this Court’s rules. The record in this case consists…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dimambro Northend Associates v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Parks v. Multimedia Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Leventhal v. SeiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Santora v. American Combustion, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Rolleston v. Estate of SimsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. SCHOENBAUM LTD., LLC v. Lenox Pines, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Holloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Millen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API