Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 2005No. A05A0242PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A Henry County jury found Aundra Smith guilty of attempted burglary. Smith appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. He further argues that the trial court improperly admitted evidence and erred in sentencing him as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we review the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. We neither weigh the evidence nor resolve issues of witness credibility, but merely determine whether the evidence was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Kapua v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Culler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  5. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brodes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Agri-Cycle LLC v. CouchSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Weeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Harvill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API