Legal Opinion
Clark v. Unum Group
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 19, 2021No. 4:20-cv-04013Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION EDWARD CLARK, 4:20-CV-04013-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ vs. MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNUM GROUP and THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Plaintiff, Edward Clark, filed suit against Unum Group and The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company alleging claims of bad faith and aiding and abetting bad faith, breach of contract and interference with contract, and alternative claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. ch. 18. Docket 1. Defendants move for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.