Legal Opinion

Puget Sound National Bank v. Selivanoff

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 17, 1973No. 1410-1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

— Plaintiff Puget Sound National Bank brought an action against defendants Selivanoff to recover on a guaranty executed by each under the circumstances next set forth. Judgment was entered against G. Michael Selivanoff, individually, and against the marital community composed of the Selivanoffs, but Carol Selivanoff in her individual capacity was dismissed. The bank appeals the judgment of dismissal.

G. Michael Selivanoff and Carol Selivanoff were husband and wife at the time of the transactions involved. They were the sole stockholders of Bigstone Corporation, Mr. Selivanoff being president…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Haviland v. . WilletsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Potucek v. Cordeleria LourdesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Geremia v. BoyarskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wired Music, Inc. v. Great River Steamboat Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Bailie Communications, Ltd. v. Trend Business SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Guardian State Bank v. StanglUtah Supreme Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API