Miller v. Lane (In Re A.J. Lane & Co.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr., Chief Judge.
Stanley Miller (the “Trustee”) has filed two motions for summary judgment under the Trustee’s multi-count complaint against numerous defendants. One motion concerns Counts 8 and 9 against Martin Hanley (“Hanley”), and the other concerns Counts 32 and 33 against Paul Lane and his wife Kathleen Lane (the “Lanes”). Paul Lane is the brother of Andrew J. Lane (the “Debtor”), one of the affiliated debtors. For the reasons set forth below, I deny both motions and instead grant summary judgment for the defendants on these counts.
As we shall see, dates are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Dyer v. Eastern Trust and Banking CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Weiss v. People Savings Bank (In Re Three Partners, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Burtch v. Hydraquip, Inc. (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Deckelbaum v. Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Chapman, P.L.L.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.