Legal Opinion
Johnnie F. Flournoy, Jr. v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Ralph Edward Dean v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Mark Dean Aldridge v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1988No. 86-3236, 86-3706 and 86-3767PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
These three habeas corpus petitions, heard on the same day before the same panel, all involve the identical issue of the proper standard for review by the district court of the findings of U.S. Magistrates. In all three cases, petitions for habeas corpus were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and referred to a U.S. Magistrate under section 636(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Magistrates Act. In all three cases the magistrates recommended that the petitions be denied. The three appellants filed timely objections. After reviewing the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Shea v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wingo v. WeddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Geraldine Wray Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Barkley v. KontehDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
- Thompson v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Victoria's Secret Stores v. Artco Equipment Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Zuern v. TateDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.