Legal Opinion
Victoria's Secret Stores v. Artco Equipment Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 27, 2002No. C-2-01-198PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Victoria’s Secret Stores, Inc., V Secret Catalogue, Inc., Victoria’s Secret Direct, LLC, and Intimate Beauty Corp. (collectively “Victoria’s Secret”) bring this action under The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051, et seq., against defendants Artco Equipment Company, Inc. (“Artco”), Holt Industries, LLC (“Holt”), and Howard Goldberg (“Defendant Goldberg”).
Plaintiffs assert trademark infringement, unfair competition, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, cybersquat-ting, and other related state law claims against defendants for…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Donald and Ronald HILL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the DURIRON COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Shepard Claims Service, Inc. v. William Darrah & Associates, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Etw Corporation v. Jireh Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Microsoft Corp. v. McGeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. Four-U-Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- CrossFit, Inc. v. JenkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2014
- Future Lawn, Inc. v. Maumee Bay Landscape Contractors, L.L.C.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.