Wingo v. Wedding
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
The question here is whether federal magistrates are authorized to conduct evidentiary hearings in federal habeas corpus cases. In 1968, Congress enacted the *463Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U. S. C. §§ 631-639, to upgrade and expand the former United States commissioner system. The Act authorizes magistrates to exercise all powers formerly exercised by United States commissioners,1 and also, as a means of relieving the caseload burden of the federal district judges, empowers magistrates to try minor offenses when all parties consent,2 and to perform such additional duties assigned by the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.