Legal Opinion
Harris v. Dawson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 19, 1978No. 562PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Justice.
Appellees (sellers) instituted an action in assumpsit for damages incurred by reason of an alleged breach of contract for sale of land by the appellants (buyers). The appellants filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint which was sustained by the court below. On appeal to the Superior Court the ruling of the Common Pleas Court was reversed with three judges of the Superior Court dissenting. We granted review.
Appellants entered into a purchase agreement with appellees for the sale of a tract of land in East Buffalo Township, Union County,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Black v. American International Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Tudesco Et Ux. v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Heights Land Co. v. Swengel's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Hoover v. PontzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Coates v. CotteralSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Brokers Title Company, Inc., and the Title Guarantee Company v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, and the Title Guarantee CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Stardust Inn, Inc. v. Doshi (In Re Stardust Inn, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Fannin v. CrattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bafile v. Borough of MuncySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.