Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward Insurance v. Placek

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided May 3, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 88-4026Published

1Opinion of the Court

*522ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

Before the Court is the motion of defendant, Lida Placek, to stay or, in the alternative, to dismiss. The Court, after reviewing the memoranda of counsel and the applicable law, denies defendant’s motion for the reasons set forth below.

Montgomery Ward Insurance Company (Montgomery Ward) brings this Declaratory Judgment Action to obtain a declaration of the rights and liabilities of the parties under policy of insurance number APV 0208808 which it issued to defendant, Lida Placek. Ms. Placek seeks insurance benefits for the wrongful death of her son.

Subseq…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Evanston Insurance Company v. Jimco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API