Legal Opinion

City of Moraine v. Board of County Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1981No. 80-1101PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

I

Appellants’ first proposition of law is two-fold.

Initially, appellants assert, in essence, that, since the board of county commissioners is not specifically authorized to reconsider its own prior zoning decision, it must initiate the full procedural requirements as prescribed by R. C. 303.12 before reconsidering its own prior zoning decision.

We find no merit in this contention and hold that the county commissioners do have the inherent authority to reconsider their own legislative decisions.

R. C. 303.121 expressly confers upon the board of county *142commissioners the authority to rezone a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Tuber v. PerkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Forest City Enterprises, Inc. v. City of EastlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Application of LathamOhio Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Springfield Local School District Board of Education v. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees, Local 530Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Radtke v. Chester Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Jones v. Chagrin FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Fox v. City of LakewoodOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ohio Multi-Use Trails Ass'n v. Vinton County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API