Legal Opinion
Jones v. Chagrin Falls
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1997No. 1995-1458PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 456.] JONES, APPELLANT, v. VILLAGE OF CHAGRIN FALLS, APPELLEE. [Cite as Jones v. Chagrin Falls,
1997-Ohio-253.] Civil procedure—Doctrine of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is not a jurisdictional defect to a declaratory judgment action, but an affirmative defense that may be waived if not timely asserted and maintained. The doctrine of failure to exhaust administrative remedies is not a jurisdictional defect to a declaratory judgment action; it is an affirmative defense that may be waived if not timely…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wymsylo v. Bartec, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Derakhshan v. State Medical Bd., 07ap-261 (10-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Musial Offices, Ltd. v. Cuyahoga Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.