Legal Opinion

Tuber v. Perkins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1966No. 39279PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The primary question raised by this action is whether an appeal may be prosecuted to the Court of Common Pleas under the provisions of Section 2506.01 et seq., Revised Code, from the action of a Board of Township Trustees amending a zoning resolution.

Section 2506.01, Revised Code, reads in part as follows:

“Every final order, adjudication, or decision of any officer, tribunal, authority, board, bureau, commission, department or other division of any political subdivision of the state may be reviewed by the Common Pleas Court of the county in which the principal office of the political…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zangerle v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Township of Dearborn v. Dearborn Township ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Randall v. Meridian Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schomaeker v. First National Bank of OttawaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API