Legal Opinion

United States v. Forest Glen Senior Residence

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 2, 1967No. Civ. No. 66-412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KILKENNY, District Judge:

Defendant Forest Glen Senior Residence, an Oregon corporation, constructed a large apartment facility at. *344Canyonvüle, Oregon. The construction funds, in large part, were obtained from State Finance Company and insured by the Federal Housing Administration, pursuant to the provisions of Title II, § 213 of the National Housing- Act, as amended. On default, the mortgage was assigned to the Federal Housing Commissioner for commencement of this foreclosure action.

Plaintiff has moved for a decree which would bar the mortgagor, and those claiming under it, from a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. View Crest Garden Apts., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. Sylacauga Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Southwest Engine Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Chester Park Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. CoyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. United States v. HarkleroadDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. United States v. RobidouxDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. United States v. TownsendDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API