Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1985No. 84-1035PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a libel action on the basis that continued litigation would result in the disclosure of privileged state secrets. James W. Fitzgerald initiated this action following the publication of an allegedly libelous article in Penthouse Magazine. The U.S. Navy moved to intervene on the ground that the government had a national security interest at stake in the trial which could not be adequately protected by the parties, and moved to dismiss the action on the basis that the trial would lead to disclosure of privileged state secrets. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Continental Group, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Lawrence M. Bareford, Individually v. General Dynamics Corporation, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Fitzgerald v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Tilden v. TenetDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API