Legal Opinion
Zeledon v. Bowery Savings Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.
On May 29, 1945, plaintiff, an iron worker of many years of experience, was engaged, as an employee of Buehler Iron Works, in removing a fire escape from the rear wall of a multiple dwelling at 124 West 102nd Street, then owned by defendant Tiedeman. While so engaged he fell and sustained personal injuries, and to recover damages for such injuries he brings this action against the owner Tiedeman and against two former owners, Bowery Savings Bank and Doren Holding Co., Inc.
The fire escape was of the vertical ladder type, with respect to which the Multiple Dwelling Law had provided that after…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kowalsky v. Conreco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Kilmer v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Pharm v. LituchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Storm v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monroe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1990
- J. R. Whitlow v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company and Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Leigh v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Leigh v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961