Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leigh v. Wadsworth

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 14, 1961No. 38819Published

1DissentHalley, Justice

I dissent to the majority opinion in this case for the reason that it lays down rules of law that are unsound and misapplies a rule of law to the evidence.

The majority says here that a builder-vendor is liable to a third person for an injury which resulted from the collapse of a porch on a house built and sold by the defendant to Dwight W. Shelby who sold to J. R. Vandergrift who> rented to plaintiff and her husband.

In this case the defendant was not a big operator but he did build a number of houses in Stillwater that were not expensive and were built to get G-I loans. The house in question…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Helen Hanna, Cicero Hanna v. Annie C. Fletcher, Trustee of Estate of Florence Johnson, Benjamin F. Fletcher, and Fred S. Gichner Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Hale v. DepaoliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Smith v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API