Legal Opinion

SM Motor Co. v. Mather

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 16, 1992No. 90-21041; CA A72515PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming and adopting the referee’s order holding claimant’s aggravation claim compensable. We affirm the Board and write only to address the question of the timeliness of the claim.

The referee’s findings are not challenged: Claimant suffered a compensable neck and upper back injury in 1984 while working as a mechanic. The referee found that the injury had “resulted in no temporary or permanent disability compensation.” The claim was closed in August, 1985.1

Claimant suffered intermittent neck pain after his claim was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lough v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gerber v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Johnson v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Nelson v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. S-M Motor Co. v. MatherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API