Legal Opinion

Nacht v. Nathan Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by William Reisfeld and another from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 13th day of January, 1919, granting their motion to ascertain and foreclose their attorneys’ hen herein, but fixing the same at the sum of only $150.

1Opinion of the Court

Shearn, J.:

This is a special proceeding instituted by the attorneys for the plaintiff to determine and enforce their hen pursuant to section 475 of the Judiciary Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 30; Laws of 1909, chap. 35), the action having been settled behind the backs of the attorneys by a corporation which had insured the defendant against liabihty.

On October 29, 1918, Morris Nacht, whose son had been killed by the negligence of the defendant, retained the petitioners to institute and maintain legal proceedings to recover damages for the death of his son and agreed to pay the petitioners for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Morehouse v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of WeberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Downey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Neely v. Hollywood Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Maier v. Maze Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Barnes v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API