Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1983No. 82AP-517PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Plaintiff-appellee, city of Cleveland, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment alleging that defendants-appellants, the Industrial Commission and the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, assessed $3,072,724.74 in workers’ compensation premiums against it without authority. Defendants filed their answer in due course. The parties entered a Stipulation of Facts, which quoted in part as follows:

“3. At all times material herein the City furnished the County Auditor of the County of Cuyahoga (hereinafter, the ‘Auditor’) with reports (which reports have never been determined to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Newark v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Harry Wolsky Stair Builder, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Knapp v. HusaOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API