Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. Zenderman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 1, 2009No. 08-2099PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

579 F.3d 1171 (2009)

Steffan HOBBS, by and through his parents and next friends, Jimmy and Janet HOBBS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Marsha ZENDERMAN; Joey Kellenaers; and Pamela Hyde, Secretary of the Department of Human Services, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees.

The Special Needs Alliance; New Mexico Chapter of the National Academy of Elder Lawyers; New Mexico Trial Lawyers Association; States of Colorado, Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming, Amici Curiae.

N…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DurastantiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Cummings v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Kitchen v. HerbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Davis v. ShahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Carabajal v. City of Cheyenne, WYCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API