Legal Opinion

Holman v. Goldome Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Helen E. Freedman, J.

Plaintiffs, tenants in a housing development known as Paul Dunbar Apartments, bring a declaratory judgment action seeking: (1) to review prior actions of the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development (hereinafter HPD), in approving a “participation loan” to Goldome Bank; (2) to be *616permitted to participate in the process by which rents are restructured; and (3) to participate in determining when the rehabilitation has been completed.

The facts in this case do not appear to be in dispute. They are, briefly stated, as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Press v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Brandon v. ChefetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Lenihan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Independence Plaza North Tenants' Ass'n v. Independence Plaza AssociatesNew York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API