Legal Opinion

People v. Baskins

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 29, 1946No. Crim. 3943PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Defendants were charged under section 653f of the Penal Code with having solicited Henry Davis to commit and join in the commission of the crime of murder of one John R. Baskins. They were tried by a jury and convicted. Each defendant made a motion for a new trial based upon all statutory grounds and said motions were denied.

Defendants’ appeal is upon two grounds: (1) the insufficiency of the evidence; (2) prejudicial error of the court in refusing to give instructions requested by defendants.

1. Sufficiency of the evidence, Henry Davis, the person alleged to have been solicited to commit the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. FolletteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. LawlorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. WayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. FurrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. People v. PoindexterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. De PaulaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API