Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Disciplinary Matter Involving Brown

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2017No. Supreme Court No. S-16552Published

1DissentCarney, Justice

She would reject the stipulation because the agreed-upon discipline is too lenient.

Attachment

BEFORE THE ALASKA BAR ASSOCIATION DISCIPLINARY BOARD

STIPULATION FOR DISCIPLINE BY CONSENT PURSUANT TO ALASKA BAR RULE 22(h)

Pursuant to Aaska Bar Rule 22(h), Gayle Brown, Respondent, by and through counsel, John Murtagh, and Louise Driscoll, Assistant Bar Counsel, stipulate as follows:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. Gayle Brown is, and was at all times pertinent, an attorney at law admitted to practice by the Supreme Court of Aaska, and a member of the Aaska Bar Association. At all times relevant Brown…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In RE McGRATHAlaska Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API