Legal Opinion
Kanterman v. Attorney-General
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Greenfield, J.
Petitio .er Donald B. Kanterman seeks an order quashing a subpoena dated March 30,1973, which was served upon him by the respondent Attorney-General of the State of New York pursuant to section 352 of article 23-A of the General Business Law (Martin Act), which in part provides for investigation by the Attorney-General of fraudulent practices in respe'et to stocks, bonds, qnd other securities. The subpoena in question directs the petitioner ‘ ‘ to testify " * * in regard to the practices of Kanterman Partners, and D. B. K. Partners, and Donald B. Kanterman and others in the issuance, -sale,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Communications Commission, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Taft B. Schreiber and McA Inc., Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Haaland v. PomushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Sanborn v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Energy Leasing Corp. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. Sommer, New York County Courts1974
- Abrams v. KearneyNew York Supreme Court · 1986
- Abrams v. Alliance For Progress, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- Gutterman v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.