First Energy Leasing Corp. v. Attorney-General
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
When the Attorney-General conducts an examination pursuant to the Martin Act (General Business Law art 23-A), and proceeds specifically under General Business Law §§ 354 and 355, he is by express provision of the statute permitted to examine witnesses only before a Justice of the Supreme Court or a designated Referee. We reject the Attorney-General’s argument that the broad powers accorded him under General Business Law § 352 (investigation by Attorney-General) override the explicit requirements of sections 354 and 355.
The Attorney-General made an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Lexington Sixty-First AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- All Seasons Resorts, Inc. v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Kanterman v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Bayou Hedge Fund LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Badem Buildings v. AbramsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re Tremont Securities Law, State Law & Insurance LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Meridian Horizon Fund, LP v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- McMahon v. LandonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.