Legal Opinion
Rothschild v. American Railway Express Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Defendant is a common carrier. (Interstate Commerce Act [24 U. S. Stat. at Large, 379], § 1, subd. 3, as amd. by Commerce Court Act [36 id. 544, 545], § 7, and Transportation Act of 1920 [41 id. 474], § 400; now U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 1, subd. 3.) Its duty is to establish and enforce reasonable regulations affecting the marking and delivering of packages of property. (Interstate Commerce Act [24 U. S. Stat. at Large, 380], § 6, as amd. by 34 id. 586, § 2; 33 id. 548, § 9; 37 id. 568, § 11; 39 id. 604, chap. 417, and 41 id. 483, §§ 409 — 413; now U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 6.) Its Official Express…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- People ex rel. W. T. Grant Realty Corp. v. ClintonNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- United Video Buyers Ass'n v. North Penn Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987