Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Phelps

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 24, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Bill by Rensselaer R. Curtis, as receiver of‘the First National Bank of New Berlin, against Aimer H. Phelps and others. On motion by defendant Herbert R. Wheeler for a further and better statement of complainant’s claim and further and better particulars of the various matters alleged in the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

The complainant is the receiver of the First National Bank of New Berlin, and his information necessarily has been derived from an examination of the books of the said bank and papers found therein when it was closed and came into his possession, and information derived from the directors, officers, and employés and customers of the said bank, and people residing in that vicinity.

[1] The defendants were directors of the said bank, and, for years, or during their respective terms of office, had access to all the books and papers of the' bank (and such books will be open for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Villiers v. Third Avenue RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1897
  2. MacDonald v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  2. Chase Nat. Bank of City of New York v. SaylesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1927
  3. Page Steel & Wire Co. v. Blair Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
  4. Bodine v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1922
  5. United Lace & Braid Mfg. Co. v. Barthels Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API