Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 14, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Debt under a statute. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

This is the defendant corporation’s petition for a new trial after a verdict for the plaintiff of an action of debt brought under section 2 of an act entitled “An act in amendment of an act entitled fAn act to incorporate the New York, Providence & Boston Railroad Company' passed at June session, A. D. 1836” (R. I. Acts & Res. June Ses. 1836, p. 3), which reads as follows, viz.;—

“Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, that said corporation shall be liable to pay to the owner or owners for all damages which may arise from the burning of houses, wood, hay, or any other substance whatever, by fire…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. GibsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Curtis v. PhelpsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1913
  2. Gorham Mfg. Co. v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API