Commonwealth v. Hernandez
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
The defendant, Junior Hernandez, was convicted of trafficking in cocaine over one hundred grams, on both principal and joint venture theories. He appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to convict him as a principal and that the judge committed prejudicial error in the joint venture instructions. The Appeals Court affirmed in an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28. Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 56 Mass. App. Ct. 1110 (2002). We granted the defendant’s application for further appellate review and now affirm.
*6891. Facts. The jury could have found the following…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. SantanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. SinforosoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. LampronMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. SuarezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- United States v. CapeltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Commonwealth v. Bernardino LopezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.