Legal Opinion

Fleming v. McClaflin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1891No. 147PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the court below, commenced this action against the appellees upon a promissory note which appellants held by assignment.

The appellees answered in four paragraphs: 1st. General denial. 2d. That the note was given for the unpaid balance of the purchase-price of a stallion, named Bonner, sold the appellees by Nicholas Lape, the original payee in the note, warranted to be twelve years of age, and to have the following pedigree: “ Bonner was sired by a stallion called Robert Wilson of Kentucky, and Robert Wilson was sired by Rysdyke’s Hambletonian; ” that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Slocovich v. Orient Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens Street Railroad v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Estes v. Anderson Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Freeman v. HutchinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Meldon v. CoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API