Legal Opinion

Gerow v. Hyde

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. Docket No. 105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Cheboygan; Shepherd, J. Garnishment proceedings by Arthur M. Gerow against Robert N. Hyde, as garnishee of Isaac J. Stewart. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against one Stewart in justice’s court in 1897. He commenced garnishee proceedings against Hyde in 1900, before the successor in office of the justice of the peace who rendered the judgment against Stewart. Garnishee process being served, Hyde filed his disclosure, admitting his indebtedness, on October 29,1900, and on October 30,1900, the return day of the garnishee summons, in the absence of the garnishee, who did not appear, judgment was rendered against him. An appeal was taken to the circuit court by Hyde, who was permitted to file a plea of the general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laidlaw v. MorrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hirth v. PfeifleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M. M. Gantz Co. v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Shank v. LippmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Holmquist v. SorensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API