Shank v. Lippman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
June 21, 1926, plaintiff had' judgment agaiist defendant. June 21,1927, Leo Anastas commenced suit against plaintiff Shank and garnishment process was served on defendant Lippman. Defendant, by letter, notified Campbell, Dewey, Stanton & Bushnell, attorneys for plaintiff Shank, of the garnishment proceedings, and asked them to recall execution outstanding against him. The next day he filed disclosure, admitting liability to Mrs. Shank, on judgment in the sum of $2,590.37. August 10, 1927, plaintiff’s attorneys gave defendant notice that they had a lien on the judgment for services and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Wipfler v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Butler v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Dreiband v. CandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Wells v. ElsamMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re AshleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Miller v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Jones v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Fraam v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Peoples Lumber Co. v. StrehlkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.