Hirth v. Pfeifle

Plaintiffs in' error, being sued on a joint note given by them payable to the order of defend^ ant ’ in error, set up in defense that one of them, J ohn M. Hirth, had been previously garnished in a suit against one Adam Pfeifle whom they averred to have been always-the real owner of the note, and that John M. Hirth *33thereupon disclosed that he was indebted to said Adam Pfeifle on the note, and upon that disclosure judgment was rendered against him for its amount.

The record shows that on the 2d day of November, 1877, one Christian Schmidt sued John M. Hirth as garnishee of John A. Pfeifle in…