Legal Opinion
Resnik v. Anderson & Miles
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 1980No. Civ. 58155PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HANSON (Thaxton), J.
Defendant Anderson and Miles, a California corporation, doing business as Day Realty (hereinafter Day), appeals the judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Gerald Resnik in a trial de novo of a dispute initially heard by the Labor Commissioner.
Facts
Gerald Resnik worked for Day as a licensed real estate salesperson from February 24, 1976, to November 4, 1977, pursuant to a written contract. During this period he became entitled to a commission of $956.81 as a result of a real estate listing he obtained for Day. Day failed to pay $478.41 1 of this amount and Resnik…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grand v. GriesingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Norins Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Post v. Palo/Haklar & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Noble v. DraperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- White v. Uniroyal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Fillmore v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.