Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Ferguson

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided August 1, 1996No. 2:95-cr-00093PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING PETITION WITH PREJUDICE

ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

Before the court are petitioner Anthony R. Hamill’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation that his habeas corpus petition be dismissed with prejudice because his claims are procedurally defaulted. Having considered all of the relevant facts and law and the materials submitted by the parties, and having reviewed de novo the report and recommendation, the court rejects…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gaylor v. HarrelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
  2. Weldon v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary WardenDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1997
  3. Hamill v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API