Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Ferguson

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided August 1, 1996No. 95-CV-241-JPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SUSTAINING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; REQUIRING SERVICE OF PETITION AND RESPONSE THERETO

ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

Before the court are petitioner Anthony R. Hamill’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation that his habeas corpus petition be dismissed without prejudice because he has not exhausted the remedies available to him under Wyoming law. The court finds Mr. Hamill’s objections are timely, and it will therefore review the report and recommendation de novo. Having done so, and having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lennox v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Hamill v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API