Legal Opinion

Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lomelo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 25, 1991No. Nos. 89-6203, 90-5459PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we affirm the district court's rulings (1) that a municipality is not necessarily liable, in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit, for a city official’s criminal activities, although the activities are related to the city official’s area of responsibility, and (2) that a prevailing party, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d), may recover costs, although the costs were paid by a non-party.

FACTS

Manor Health Care (Manor) is a Delaware corporation engaged in the business of building and operating nursing homes throughout the United States. In December, 1982,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Scala v. City of Winter ParkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. Morro v. City of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Mary Quinn v. Monroe County, James L. Roberts, County Administrator, Monroe County, individually and in his official capacityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Arcadian Fertilizer, L.P. v. Mpw Industrial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API