Legal Opinion

Harris v. Camp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application for writ of mandamus by Carolina Harris and others against J. L Camp, District Judge. Application denied J. D. Childs, of San Antonio, for relators Wm. Aubrey, of San Antonio, for respondent

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, O. J.

This is a petition for the writ of mandamus to require the judge of the Eorty-Eifth district court to prepare for filing a statement of facts in a cause which appears to have been duly appealed to this court.

[1] The fall term of 1911, at which the judgment appealed from was rendered, was one authorized by law to continue more than 8 weeks. The statute (Gen. Laws 32d Leg. 1911, p. 266, § 7) enacts: “Provided if the term of said court may by law continúe more than eight weeks said statement of facts and bills of exception shall be filed within thirty days after final judgment shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamill v. SamuelsTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pecos & Northern Texas Railroad v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Unknown Heirs of Criswell v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Dobie v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Hoff v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API