Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1923No. 2220PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

This case is before this court on a motion by appellant to reverse and remand the case because of the failure and refusal of the trial judge to prepare and file a statement of facts after attorneys had failed to-agree to such statement, or, in the alternative, that mandamus issue compelling and requiring said trial judge to prepare and file such statement of facts. Judgment having been rendered in the trial court against appellant; motion for new trial made, overruled, and notice of appeal given as required by law, the trial court adjourned February 3, 1928. Having filed its appeal bond…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Aransas Pass v. Eureka Fire Hose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Waco Brick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Early-Foster Co. v. Mid-Tex MillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Harris v. CampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludtke v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API