Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Samuels

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1911No. 2217PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals, Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brown

This is a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Second District. The statement and question are as follows:

“In the above cause now pending in this court we have before us appellants’ motion for a rehearing of a decision heretofore made by us sustaining appellee’s motion to strike out the statement of facts filed in this court April 18th, 1910. That motion was based upon the fol lowing grounds, to wit: ‘Because said statement of facts was not filed within thirty days after final judgment was rendered in the trial court, said trial court being empowered by law to continue…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Couturie v. CrespiTexas Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McCormick v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lafield v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Nothaf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. Co. v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Unknown Heirs of Criswell v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API