Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 25, 1967PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCotter, J.
The plaintiff, the owner of property in a residence zone immediately adjacent to the land in question, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas from the action of the defendant town plan and zoning commission, which, on the application of the defendant Donald Tarinelli, changed the zone of Tarinelli’s property from a residence B district to a designed residence district No. 1, hereinafter sometimes referred to as DBD-1. The plaintiff and the defendants have both appealed from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the commission’s action.
The property covered by the change of zone…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Town of Lebanon v. WoodsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Levinsky v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Cameo Park Homes, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- DeForest & Hotchkiss Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.