Legal Opinion
Cameo Park Homes, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 11, 1963PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiff owns about 19.86 acres of vacant land situated in an RS-3 district in Stratford. Under §4.2 of the Stratford zoning regulations, the uses in an RS-3 district are restricted primarily to one-family dwellings on lots having a minimum area of 10,000 square feet. See Stratford Zoning Regs. §§2.1, 4.1.1 (1957). Section 5.4.2 of the regulations provides, however, that in such a district garden apartment developments covering not more than twenty acres “may be approved as special cases as provided in Section 20 of these regulations.” A garden apartment development is defined as “a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Summ v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- DeMaria v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- McCrann v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.